Public Space Magazine
A place to think about mind and matters

The death and regeneration
of farmers markets 2014



Seattle's Pike Place Market

From Farm to Market. The market is a fragile kaleidoscope of merchants, mostly foreign born and fiercely independent.
Elizabeth Tanner, Pike Place Market Initiative, 1971.

THE NATION'S LONGEST RUNNING MARKET

The Market represents an essential human need to engage in face-to-face transactions.

There are historic markets such as Cleveland’s West Side Market, Philadelphia’s Reading Market, as well as newly developed market halls in Milwaukee, Little Rock, and Portland, Maine.

One of the most famous is Seattle’s Pike Place market,

Seattle's Pike Place Market was born from some visionary leadership in city government at the turn of the century and farmers' resistance to the unfair practices by middlemen and shortly afterwards hungry developers whose primary interest was capitalizing on the land.

Although there were over 3000 farms in the farmlands surrounding Seattle, city residents had poor access to fresh produce. Food prices were beyond the average person because buying and selling of produce was controlled by middlemen found in Commission Houses along what was known as Produce Row. These middlemen controlled prices on both ends. Consequently, it was common for produce to be thrown in Seattle's Elliott Bay or to be left rotting in a fertile valley.

A farmers market where the buyer could meet the producer-farmer was a vision of a city councilman, Thomas P. Revelle.

The councilman revived a city ordinance passed in 1893, similar to that of other cities at the time.

In July 1907, the ordinance was finally put into effect and on a rainy city on August 16, 1907 Pike Place Market opened for business.

The Selling of the Market, Produced by Friends of the Market

Less than a dozen farmers showed up, but their produce was grabbed by socialites and workers. In the following weeks, hundreds of wagons lined up along Seattle's Pike Street.

By 1908 tented awnings were in place. Wagons and a few cars competed for diminishing parking space on Pike Street. The shopping experience was perpetually muddy and chaotic.

The facade of the market was born when Frank Goodwin, a self-taught architect, sketched plans for a building on the back of an envelope. His initial plan called for 76 stalls.  Goodwin, had an eye for real estate investment. He  also had around $50,000 in gold to spend on the project from a claim he had worked in Alaska.

Three and a half months after the market's opening a building was completed and ready to house fall produce.

Goodwin's plans expanded to include an area stretching from the Leland Hotel, which he owned, to the north, along the west bank of the bluff looking down over the Seattle waterfront. By the market's third anniversary a double row of stalls was in place and stalls were narrowed to accommodate more farmers.

The Market became the heart of Seattle. It quickly grew and along with this growth competition among the farmers. Stalls and parking spaces for wagons and the few cars on the road were scarce.

Farmers from nearby islands paid two bits to spend the night to compete with farmers from the valley. Elaborate displays were created as part of their competition by farmers' with origins from Scandinavia, Japan, and Italy.

By 1913 Pike Place Market had a look preserved for the most part in 2014. Underlying that, there was a fundamental conflict over preserving the market and development practices that continues today.

The public market preserves generations of skills and talent.

By the 1920s, pressure from developers led to the city council passing a resolution barring farmers’ stalls in the street. It was proposed that the farmers move from the Market. (this was not the only time the suggestion was made) to another location where they would be housed in a underground market.

The farmers organized and circulated petitions to preserve the original farmers market.

In 1921, a lease was arranged with the Goodwins who had began construction in the market on what became known as the Municipal Building. This was the last major construction in the market for the next five decades.

In 1926, Arthur Goodwin, a nephew of Frank Goodwin, began to rent stalls in a prime location to vendors who were middlemen. He argued that they would benefit the market because they offered year around visibility.

Local farmers believed this violated the meaning of a public market and threatened to put up tents at Fourth and Stewart and sell from there as a last resort.

Led by Willard Soames, farmers banded together to fight for their rights yet again. Their lawyer, George F. Vanderveer, referring to the disputed frontage consisting of 120-feet of stall space on Pike Place, declared a both a fraud on the public and a violation of farmer’ rights stating that the stalls on city property were actually being leased to middlemen, not producers.

The farmers stayed in the market, but there were bad feelings and distrust because of the history of threats against the original purpose of the market. The power of well-funded and self-interested development was real and insidious.

What must have been a deep inner moment of realization for both sides occurred when Arthur Goodwin, the nephew of the man who had designed the physical structure of the Market said during a hearing, “we (the Goodwins) made the market.” An audience of farmers with roots in the original movement against middlemen responded, “the farmers made it.”

The struggle to preserve the market both its facades and its values would prove to be a matter of vigilance shared across the country.

Links

Lack of food security (link updated 2021)  has become a trend that has reached the middle class regardless of educational backgrounds. The good news is that small farmers market found in abundance are matched with reaching vulnerable populations through programs such as SNAP. The bad news is too many people are going to Walmart and dollar stores, opting for prepackaged foods.

The Project for Public Spaces has adopted a mission called Wholesome Wave. The goal is to nourish neighborhoods by supporting increased production and access to healthy, fresh and affordable locally grown food. A collaboration between organizations published a handy guide to establish a program in your local farmers market is available for free here.

Slow Foods USA

On December 10, 1989, the Slow Food movement was born. The Slow Food Manifesto, drafted by co-founder Folco Portinari and endorsed by delegates from 15 countries, condemned the “fast life” and its implications on culture and society.

Slow Food has over 150,000 members and is active in more than 150 countries, including national associations in Italy, the U.S., Germany and Japan. There are more than 170 chapters and 2,000 food communities in the United States alone.

Scaling up local food systems

Farmers markets do not fit the economies of scale, if the only interest is economics,
David K. O'Neil, The Project for Public Spaces.

In 2010, the Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education national organization (SARE) reported that farmers markets, CSA farms, and other opportunities for consumers to buy fresh, local foods are popping up around every corner. Yet a 2010 USDA report found that direct-to-consumer sales accounted for only 0.4 percent of total agricultural sales in 2007, up from 0.3 percent in 1997.

The picture does not get better in 2014. A survey published by retail design firm King Retail Solutions in conjunction with the University of Arizona’s Terry J. Lundgren Center for Retailing and reported in Forbes found that people are more likely to buy from nonfood stores such as Walmart or dollar stores now and in the future. Oddly, according to the survey, the wealthier people are the more likely they are to buy at a big box store like Walmart. This, of course, hurts farmers and the general health of the nation. It probably does not say much about the relationship between wealth and education, either.

SARE defines “Scaling Up” local food as "the process of building the system necessary to make local food available to a wider segment of the population than currently possible. Key challenges to scaling up include ensuring a sufficient, high quality level of agricultural production, providing efficient storage and transportation, and developing marketing and sales relationships with wholesale buyers, distributors, and brokers." There are some inspiring examples of scaling up successes including Greenmarket in New York City founded in 1976, The Food Trust's farmers markets in Philadelphia, and, interestingly, Kaiser Permanente farmers markets.
The USDA has publications and sources for funding to further the farm to market connection, including resource ideas for scaling up.

On the urban development side, there is the example of the Augusta Georgia revitalization under The Augusta Sustainable Development Implementation Program. This was a program to revitalize a corridor through transparent process which was the project's biggest goal , City Manager, John Paul Stout said , “It was extremely important to let the area’s current residents know that the intention was to make their community stronger and not to embellish projects that would never come to fruition. Through public input, we found out that residents actually wanted farmers markets, grocery stores, restaurants, access to healthy food choices, and aesthetically pleasing landscapes along the corridor,” Now, community members are excited to see the project move forward.

However, a policy statement adopted by the American Planning Foundation (APA) says, "The private sector may initiate redevelopment projects without any active public involvement beyond the government's traditional regulatory role...there has been a general reluctance to have the public act in a way that either competes with or unnecessarily substitutes for private action.

The very concept of farmers markets represents a public space. Pike Place Market in Seattle is a quasi governmental entity operating on public land that has been historically beleagured by development. Needless to say markets have been around as long as humans have gathered in one place. They represent more than commercial trade. Embodied in movements such as the International Slow Foods Movement, farmers markets represent a common denominator, which is a global democracy .

Seattle's Pike Place Market - Ordering food from amazon.com and lonely treks down supermarket aisles for items wrapped in plastic is not what sustains civilization. Exchanges in open air public markets have been integral to the survival of humanity in history and prehistory.


In large cities around the country, farmers, butchers, and craftsmen operated stalls in Public Markets, which were usually created and managed through city ordinances. They ranged in size and scope from local enterprises to large scale markets such as the former Center market in Washington D.C., created through Congressional legislation.

PHOTO COURTESY OF FLIERFY

Smithfield Market in London.

Markets today - the challenge

Exchanges took place without the strictures of class and were characterized by ethnic diversity. The activity and movement of diverse people stimulated mixed-use development and incubating businesses.

With the growth of transportation systems and refrigeration technologies, food distribution changed. While there were benefits to larger markets in terms of transporting meats to public markets, and the beneficial growth of corner grocery stores serving local neighborhoods, there was also the growing dominance of large supermarkets. In addition, new development brought more privatized versions of the public market more interested in consumptive forms than substance.

Along with growth there has been an abandonment of physical structures that housed essential interactions, such as that between farmers as producers and consumers. , ….

Tangires (2005) said “public markets are no longer the exclusive domains of the local government, and the concept of a public market as a public amenity has been lost.”

Today, redevelopment by special interests for private gain in the US and elsewhere is a powerful force. There is also a negotiation or dialectic over what is important to preserve and/or protect.

As Tangires notes, the survival of the public market depends on the relationship between local governments and the public.

In London, there was a controversial plan to turn one of London's best known Victorian markets, Smithfield Market
into an office and retail complex. This involved gutting the interiors and allowing some of the building to rot. In Britain saving the former cattle market was the subject of rival claims of heritage and development.

The opposition to save the Smithfield market won. Regeneration involved not only preserving the ornate existing facade but maintaining historic elements of the interior that allowed exchanges and allowing the market to serve as a center for friendlier development in the public interest.

In order to win the war between consumerism and meaningful exchanges and embody the idea of "farmers" markets, the "guts" of the facades - relationship between the producers and consumers needs to be made a reality.

Addressing the guts of farmers markets requires the competitive pricing of produce, supporting farmers' and urban transportation systems to the market as a center, subsidizing equitable farm to market strategies that bring fresh foods to the most vulnerable populations, incubating small businesses related to farming and goods in a move away from the dominant service economy, addressing the the scarcity of land, urban design that encourages public space surrounding farmers' market, and city ordinances that foster cooperation between private and public interests for the common good.

In Augusta Georgia revitalization under The Augusta Sustainable Development Implementation Program revitalized a corridor through transparent process. The farmers market was a critical part of the urban design.

People want their farmers markets and so they survive as important public spaces as incubators of food entrepreneurship, and as showcases for locally grown or produced foods despite social change and rapid development. Despite the changes in society and in cities that led to the decline of public markets, many cities around North America have maintained historic markets or developed new ones as important public spaces. given the increasing scarcity of land, these markets have depended on private public partnerships/cooperation. In relation to London's Smithfield site it seems that the city's ownership of market buildings was an advantage. Public ownership with protective use guidelines is important to preserving the traditional role of the market rather than selling out to the highest bidder under the rubric of not for profit development.

 

Copyright ©Public Space Mag 2014

psm@publicspacemag.com

>